Metal-organic frameworks (mof) for gas capture

ABSTRACT

The present invention relates to a metal organic framework comprising of a metal ion (M) and an organic ligand wherein more than one hydroxy ligand are present about the metal ion. Also provided is a method for synthesising the metal-organic frameworks and their application in areas including scrubbing exhaust gas streams of acidic gases, scrubbing natural gas of acidic gases by separation or sequestration and separating C 2 H a  or other VOC gases from other gas mixtures.

This invention relates to coordination polymers, and in particular to metal organic frameworks, and the use of such metal organic frameworks for gas capture. The invention also relates to a method of making such metal organic frameworks

BACKGROUND

It is widely accepted that it is imperative that emissions of carbon dioxide (CO₂) and other acidic gases such as sulphur dioxide (SO₂) and nitrogen dioxide (NO₂) created by human activity is reduced in order to limit the negative effects of global climate change. One particular challenge is the reduction of CO₂ emissions from flue gases produced by large industrial plant and coal-fired power stations. Current state-of-the-art technology uses aqueous solutions of organic amines for post-combustion CO₂ capture, a so called “amine-scrubbing mechanism”. These amine functionalised capture systems dominate this area, due to potential formation of carbamates via H2N(δ−) . . . C(δ+)O2 electrostatic interactions, thereby trapping CO₂ covalently. However, there are considerable costs associated with this process due to the substantial energy input required for the regeneration of the amine solutions, this is in addition to their highly corrosive and toxic nature. Thus there is a negative environmental penalty associated with the use of amines which significantly limits their long-term applications. There are, therefore, powerful drivers to develop efficient strategies to remove CO₂ using alternative materials that simultaneously have high adsorption capacity, high CO₂ selectivity and high rates of regeneration at an economically viable cost. Traditional microporous solid-state materials such as zeolites, porous membranes and activated carbon can effectively adsorb and remove CO₂. However, the low separation efficiency and poor selectivity of these materials significantly limits their real-world applicability. Therefore there is a need to develop new materials with high CO₂ storage capacity and selectivity that can be produced at an economically and environmentally viable cost.

Metal organic frameworks (MOF), a relatively new class of porous materials, are built up of metal cation nodes bridged by organic ligand linkers and they have huge potential to deliver significant breakthroughs in carbon capture. The advantages of MOFs over existing technologies include: (i) they can store greater amounts of CO₂ than other classes of porous materials, including commercial materials such as zeolite 13X and activated carbon; (ii) their surface areas and pore volume can be adjusted via appropriate crystal engineering and topological connections in order to maximise the CO₂ adsorption capacity; (iii) the pore surface and environment can be fine controlled and tuned via variation of organic and inorganic components that constitute the framework in order to enhance CO₂ capacity and selectivity; (iv) the adsorbed CO₂ molecules can be readily released via reduction of the pressure, i.e. the capture system can be regenerated without additional heating input; (v) the extended crystalline structure of MOF materials gives a unique opportunity to determine and study the mechanisms of carbon capture and storage (CCS) using advanced diffraction techniques.

US patent application US2007/0068389 describes the use of a number of Copper and Zinc based MOF materials to store carbon dioxide at room temperature. These materials show high uptakes of CO₂ and have been shown to perform better than zeolites and activated carbons as carbon dioxide storage media inside gas canisters. However, there is a need for metal-organic frameworks with:

-   -   a) higher CO2 adsorption capacity;     -   b) selective adsorption of acidic gases & VOCs;     -   c) improved framework stability;     -   d) and improved ease of manufacture.

SUMMARY

In a first aspect the present invention provides a solid crystalline metal-organic framework comprising of a metal ion, preferably one of Al(III), Cr(III), Sb(III), In(III), Ga(III), and Fe(III) and an organic ligand. Wherein said organic ligand is a polycarboxylate. Typically, the organic ligand is a tetracarboxylate; preferably a biphenyl tetracarboxylate. In the embodiments of the invention the metal ion (M) is octahedrally coordinated as the moiety MO₄(OH)₂ via six oxygen atoms. Four of the oxygen atoms are from the carboxylate groups and two of the oxygen atoms are from the hydroxyl groups.

The resulting crystalline MOF structure has channels between the repeating units of the metal-hydroxyl[tetracarboxylate] complexes. Preferably, the metal organic framework incorporates a channel decorated by metal hydroxyl groups and phenyl rings that are available to form electrostatic interactions between XO₂ (X=C, S, N) gas molecules or small hydrocarbon molecules, e.g. VOCs. The hydrocarbon molecule may be one or more of C₂H₂, C₂H₄, C₂H₆ or one of the isomers of xylene. Gases, such as methane, nitrogen, hydrogen, carbon monoxide, argon and oxygen do not interact with the framework and thus are not adsorbed by the material.

The weak interactions between the captured gas and the MOF material lead to low isoteric heats of absorption, thereby reducing the amount of energy required to drive off the captured gas and regenerate the vacated MOF material. This weak interaction is advantageous when compared to the formation of chemical bonds between amine substrates and gas molecules in amine-containing solutions/solids. Typically, in conventional amine functionalised MOFs, the isoteric heats of adsorption are 40-90 kJ mol⁻¹ for physisorption and 85-105 kJ mol⁻¹ for chemisorption. These high values for chemisorption lead to a substantial energy penalty to release adsorbed CO₂ from the metal-organic structure. Therefore a large energy penalty is avoided in using the MOF materials of the type described herein. Thus there may be applications these MOFs in industrial scale capture and separation of acidic gases due to the potentially significant energy savings available.

In such systems the CO₂ or other gases are released from the MOF during the MOF regeneration process and extracted as a stream of gas. The extracted gas can then be compressed for storage or transport. Post Combustion Capture (PCC) of acidic gases from flue gas and sequestration/separation of these gases is relevant in the following industrial sectors: power generation, iron and steel production, ammonia production, cement production, natural gas sweetening, syngas gas purification.

The MOF materials have also shown adsorption of short chain hydrocarbons gases such as ethylene and acetylene. Notably a preference for acetylene adsorption over ethylene and ethane has been observed and this selectivity is an important property which may make these MOFs suitable candidates for gas separation. In some embodiments the hydrocarbon may also be a substituted hydrocarbon such as a halogenated hydrocarbon. Furthermore, embodiments of the invention may also be applied to the capture of other small molecules such as “C3” molecules (i.e. molecules having three carbon atoms). Embodiments of the invention may also be used to capture other Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs).

Anaesthetic systems comprise of a rebreather system in which CO₂ is scrubbed from the anaesthetic gas during the cycling of the gas. Currently soda lime is used for this process. According to the present invention the MOF may be used for scrubbing the CO₂ from the recycled gas. The potential for MOFs in this area is the reduction of medical/chemical waste as soda lime has a finite life and, once depleted, it is disposed of as contaminated waste. Moreover, there is known decomposition of the anaesthetic gases due to reaction with the caustic soda lime which may lead to patient inhalation of potentially harmful by-products. Additives are used to prevent this. NOTT-300 may provide CO₂ scrubbing where no reaction between the anaesthetic gas and the MOF material is observed.

The present invention may also find use in: diving rebreathers (i.e. SCUBA); personal protective equipment (PPE), gas masks etc. (acidic gas scrubbing); military applications (PPE, gas scrubbing air in closed environments e.g. bunkers, submarines etc.), syn-gas purification; driving the water gas shift to completion for more efficient production of hydrogen from CO and water; mixed matrix materials i.e. the impregnation of MOFs into membranes for gas separation.

Typically, the organic ligand is a tetracarboxylic acid; preferably, the organic ligand is a phenyl tetracarboxylic acid; preferably, the organic ligand is a phenyl tetracarboxylic acid selected from the group having the general formula (I):

wherein R is one of:

wherein A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H, I, and J are selected from the group consisting of H, F, Cl, Br, I, CH3, CH2CH3, CH(CH3)2, C(CH3)3, NH2, NHR′, NR′R″, OH, OR′, CO2H, CO2R′, CF3, NHCOR′, NHCONHR′, NHSO2R′, SO3H; and wherein S, T, U and V are selected from the group consisting of H, F, Cl, Br, I, CH3, CH2CH3, CH(CH3)2, C(CH3)3, NH2, NHR′, NR′R″, OH, OR′, CO2H, CO2R′, CF3, NHCOR′, NHCONHR′, NHSO2R′, SO3H and

where R′ and R″ are selected from the group consisting C₁ to C₅ alkyl,

Preferably, two of A, B, C, D, or E are —COOH and two of F, G, H, I or J are —COOH. Alternatively, when only one of A, B, C, D, or E are —COOH and only one of F, G, H, I or J are —COOH, then two of T, S, U and V are —COOH or

In a preferred embodiment the organic ligand is selected from the group consisting of:

In an embodiment of the invention the MOF is one of: M₂(OH)₂(C₁₆O₈H₆); where M=Al, In, Sb, Ga, Cr being a biphenyl tetracarboxylate ligand, for example biphenyl-3,3′,5′,5′ tetracarboxylate.

In one particular example the MOF contains more than a single type metal (III) ion preferably the metal ion being selected from Al(III), Cr(III), Sb(III), In(III), Ga(III), and Fe(III) For example the complex may comprise of both gallium and iron and have the formula (Ga_(2-x)Fe_(x))(OH)₂(C₁₆O₈H₆) with x being greater than zero.

In a second aspect, the present invention provides a method for producing a metal-organic framework comprising the steps of:

-   -   a. providing one or more metal salts;     -   b. providing an organic ligand;     -   c. mixing the metal salts and the organic ligand; and     -   d. reacting the metal salts with organic ligand to form a         metal-organic framework,         wherein the metal salt is selected from Al(III), Cr(III),         Sb(III), In(II), Ga(III), and Fe(III) salts and wherein the         organic ligand is a tetracarboxylic acid tetracarboxylic acid         molecule may have the structure (I) identified hereinabove.

The synthesis of the aluminum MOF is particularly advantageous as it requires water as the only solvent and avoids the use of toxic solvents such as N,N-dimethylformamide that are commonly used to synthesise MOF materials. Additionally aluminium is a relatively cheap metal in comparison to some other metal (III) ions.

For the MOF complex Al₂(OH)₂(C₁₆O₈H₆), the method may comprise reacting biphenyl-3,3′,5,5′-tetracarboxylic acid with Al(NO₃)₃.9H₂O; for the MOF complex In₂(OH)₂(C₁₆O₈H₆) the method may comprises reacting biphenyl-3,3′,5,5′-tetracarboxylic acid with In(NO₃)₃.5H₂O; for the MOF complex Cr₂(OH)₂(C₁₆O₈H₆) and the method comprises reacting biphenyl-3,3′,5,5′-tetracarboxylic acid with Cr(NO₃)₃.9H₂O.

In one particular example the MOF contains more than one single type metal (III) ion preferably with the metal ion(s) being selected from Al(III), Cr(III), Sb(III), In(III), Ga(III), and Fe(III). For example the complex may comprise of both gallium and iron and have the formula (Ga_(2-x)Fe_(x))(OH)₂(C₁₆O₈H₆) with x being greater than zero. In one example the MOF complex is (Ga_(2-x)Fe_(x))(OH)₂(C₁₆O₈H₆), x>0, and the method comprises reacting a stoichiometric mixture of gallium nitrate, iron nitrate, hydrochloric acid and biphenyl-3,3′,5,5′-tetracarboxylic acid under solvothermal conditions.

In one embodiment the invention provides use of the MOF to capture two different gases in one pore of the MOF.

An aspect of the invention provides a gas storage/separation system comprising: an inlet for receiving gas containing XO₂ (X=C, S, N), and/or a C₂H_(n) (n=2, 4, 6); a container for receiving the gas from the inlet; and a storage/separation material comprising of the MOF framework, in supported or unsupported forms, according to aspects and embodiments of the invention set out hereinabove.

DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES

The above-mentioned and other features and objects of this invention, and the manner of obtaining them, will become more apparent and the invention itself will be better understood by reference to the following description of embodiments of the invention taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, wherein:

FIG. 1 is a schematic view comparing of gas binding interactions in amine-functionalised materials and in hydroxyl-functionalised materials;

FIG. 1( a) illustrates the bonds formed between carbon dioxide molecules and an amine group as would be present in known amine functionalised systems. In such systems the first CO₂ molecule interacts with the NH₂ group through a side-on mode and the second CO₂ molecules interacts with the first CO₂ molecule through an end-on mode. Such interactions result in high isosteric heats of adsorption particularly when there is direct bond formation between the N-centre of the amine group and the electro-positive C-carbon centre of CO₂ (i.e. chemisorption);

FIG. 1( b) illustrates the hydrogen bonds present between a hydroxyl functionalised material and CO₂ molecules;

FIG. 1( c) illustrates the hydrogen bonds present between a hydroxyl functionalised material and SO₂ molecules;

FIG. 1( d) shows the anticipated interactions believed to be the rationale behind the high NO₂ adsorption capacities observed;

FIG. 2 provides views of the structure for NOTT-solvate. The structure was solved from high resolution PXRD data by ab initio methods for NOTT Al-solvate and has been found to be correct for equivalent compounds using other metal (III) ions. FIG. 2( a) illustrates the coordination environment for ligand L⁴⁻ and M(III) centre. FIG. 2( b) illustrates a corner-sharing extended octahedral chain of [MO₄(OH)₂]_(∞). The μ₂-(OH) groups are highlighted as a space-filling model, and linked to each other in a cis-configuration. FIG. 2( c) illustrates the 3D framework structure with channel formed along the c-axis. The free water molecules in the channel are omitted for clarity. FIG. 2( d) is a schematic view of the square-shaped channel. The μ₂-(OH) groups protrude into the centre of the channel from four directions. [MO₄(OH)₂] groups are illustrated as octahedral. A μ₂-OH group is an —OH group that is coordinated to two metal centres, i.e. it is a bridging —OH group;

FIG. 3 (a) is a graph comparison of the gas adsorption isotherms for NOTT-300 (Al) at 273 K and 1.0 bar for a selection of gases;

FIG. 3 (b) is a graph illustrating the variation of isosteric enthalpy (Q_(st)) and entropy (ΔS) of CO₂ adsorption;

FIG. 4 shows in situ inelastic neutron scattering (INS) spectra and simulated CO₂ positions in the pore channel of NOTT-300 (Al);

FIG. 4 (a) shows in situ inelastic neutron scattering (INS) spectra and simulated CO₂ positions in the pore channel. This diagram shows a comparison of the experimental (top) and DFT simulated (bottom) INS spectra for bare and CO₂-loaded NOTT-300 (Al).

FIG. 4 (b) is a difference plot for experimental INS spectra of bare and CO₂-loaded NOTT-300 (Al). Two distinct energy transfer peaks are labelled as I and II.

FIG. 4 (c) is a view of the structure of NOTT-300 (Al).3.2CO₂ obtained from PXRD analysis. The adsorbed CO₂ molecules in the pore channel are highlighted by the use of ball-and-stick mode. The carbon atom of second site of CO₂ is shown. The dipole interaction between CO₂ (I, II) molecules are shown [O═C═O . . . CO₂=3.920 Å].

FIG. 4 (d) is a detailed view of the role of the —OH and —CH groups in binding CO₂ molecules in a “pocket-like” cavity. The model was obtained from DFT simulation. The modest hydrogen bond between O(δ−) of CO₂ and H(δ+) from the Al—OH moiety is shown, [O . . . H=2.335 Å]. The weak cooperative hydrogen bond interactions between O(δ−) of CO₂ and H(δ+) from —CH is shown, [O . . . H=3.029, 3.190 Å, each occurring twice]. Each O(δ−) centre therefore interacts with five different H(δ+) centres.

FIG. 5 shows in-situ synchrotron X-ray powder diffraction patterns and refined SO₂ positions in the pore channel of NOTT-300 (Al);

FIG. 5 (a) is a comparison of the powder diffraction patterns for original, evacuated, SO₂-loaded, and final desolvated samples at 273 K.

FIG. 5 (b) illustrates the crystal structure of NOTT-300 (Al).4.0SO₂ obtained from Rietveld refinement of data on SO₂-loaded material at 1.0 bar. The adsorbed SO₂ molecules in the pore channel are highlighted by the use of ball-and-stick mode. The sulphur atom of second site of SO₂ is labelled with an asterisk.

FIG. 5 (c) provides a detailed view of the role of the —OH and —CH groups in binding SO₂ molecules into a distorted “pocket-like” cavity. The moderate hydrogen bond between O(δ−) of SO₂(I) and H(δ+) from —OH is shown as the a vertical dashed line, [O . . . H=2.376(13) Å]. The weak cooperative hydrogen interaction between O(δ−) of SO₂ and H(δ+) from —CH is shown, [O . . . H=2.806(14), 2.841(17), 3.111(16), 3.725(18) Å]. Therefore, each O(δ−) centre is interacting with five different H(δ+) centres simultaneously. The bond distance between S(δ+) of SO₂(I) and O(δ−) of SO₂(II) is 3.34(7) Å.

FIG. 6 shows In situ inelastic neutron scattering (INS) spectra and simulated SO₂ positions in the pore channel of NOTT-300 (Al);

FIG. 6 (a) provides a comparison of the experimental (top) and DFT simulated (bottom) INS spectra for bare and SO₂-loaded NOTT-300;

FIG. 6 (b) is a difference plot for experimental INS spectra of bare and SO₂-loaded NOTT-300. Two distinct energy transfer peaks are labelled as I and II;

FIG. 6 (c) is a detailed view of the role of the —OH and —CH groups in binding SO₂ molecules in a “pocket-like” cavity. Model was obtained from DFT simulation. The adsorbed SO₂ molecules in the pore channel are highlighted by the use of ball-and-stick mode. The modest hydrogen bond between O(δ−) of SO₂ and H(δ+) from the Al—OH moiety is shown as the vertical dashed line, [O . . . H=2.338 Å]. The weak cooperative hydrogen bond interactions between O(δ−) of CO₂ and H(δ+) from —CH is shown, [O . . . H=2.965-3.238 Å]. Each O(δ−) centre therefore interacts with five different H(δ+) centres;

FIG. 7 is a three dimensional representation of the pore structure of a MOF according to an embodiment of the invention;

FIG. 8 is a graph comparing the gas adsorption isotherms of various hydrocarbons with NOTT-300 (Al). The corresponding desorption isotherms exhibit full reversibility without hysteresis demonstrating the stability of the MOF in the hydrocarbon environments.

FIG. 9 shows graphs of the gas selectivity ratio for C₂H₂/C₂H₄ with NOTT-300 (Al) as a function of gas pressure at various temperatures. Also see Table A provides derived values of extreme selectivity ratios for C₂H₂/C₂H₄ at 0 mbar.

FIG. 10 shows INS spectra for adsorbed C2H₂ and C₂H₄ in NOTT-300(Al)

FIG. 11 shows INS spectra for condensed phase C₂H₂.

FIG. 12 shows in situ diamond powder diffraction patterns for C₂H₂-loaded NOTT-300.

FIG. 13 is an illustration of the structure of NOTT-300 (Al).3C₂H₂;

FIG. 14 is an illustration of the structure of NOTT-300 (Al).1C₂H₄;

FIG. 15 is an illustration of the structure of NOTT-300 (Al).1C₂H₆;

FIG. 16 illustrates INS spectra for C₂H_(2,4);

FIG. 17 is an illustration of the structure of NOTT-300 (Al).2.4C₂H₂.0.7C₂H₄;

FIG. 18 is an illustration of some structures of NOTT-300 (Al) with adsorbed acetylene and/or ethylene;

FIG. 19 provides graphs of enthalpy and entropy versus gas pressure for the adsorption of C₂H₂ and C₂H₄;

FIG. 20 illustrates a gas adsorption isotherm of NO₂ with NOTT-300 (Al) at 295K.

FIG. 21 illustrates X-ray diffraction data for NOTT-300 (In). FIG. 21( a) is a broad 2Th degree spectrum whereas FIG. 21( b) is a scaled up spectrum and FIG. 21 (c) is an even further scaled up spectrum.

FIG. 22( a) illustrates the gas adsorption isotherms of NOTT-300 (Cr) for CO₂ at various temperatures. It can be seen that there is a high uptake of CO₂;

FIG. 22( b) shows the CO₂ gas adsorption isotherm for NOTT-300 (Cr) at 198K to more clearly show a high degree of hysteresis between adsorption and desorption thereby indicating the stability of the complex in carbon dioxide gas;

FIG. 22( c) shows the N₂ gas adsorption isotherm for NOTT-300 (Cr). It can be seen that the uptake of N₂ here is higher than for NOTT-300 (Al);

FIG. 22( d) shows the CH₄ gas adsorption isotherm for NOTT-300 (Cr);

FIG. 22( e) shows the H₂ gas adsorption isotherm for NOTT-300 (Cr). It can be seen that the uptake of these gases is very low compared to CO₂ and SO₂. All the isotherms show good hysteresis of between adsorption and desorption of the gases demonstrating the stability of the compound in the gases.

FIG. 23 is a packing diagram for NOTT-300 (Cr) illustrating that this MOF is isostructural with NOTT-300 (Al) with 1-dimensional square pore channels.

FIG. 24 illustrates the powder X-ray diffraction data (PXRD) patterns for (Ga_(2-x) Fe_(x))MOF (x=0, 0.13, 0.21, 0.45). The patterns confirm that the parent MOF NOTT-300 (Ga)-solvated is iso-structural to NOTT-300(Al)-solvated.

FIG. 25 shows the CO₂ adsorption isotherms for NOTT3-00(Ga_(2-x)Fe_(x)) (x=0, 0.13, 0.21, 0.45) at 195 K at pressures up to 1 bar. It can be seen that the degree of CO₂ uptake is dependent on the molar ratio of Ga and Fe used in the MOF.

FIG. 26 shows the CO₂ adsorption isotherms for NOTT-300(Ga_(2-x)Fe_(x)) (x=0, 0.13, 0.21, 0.45) at 293 K at pressures up to 20 bar.

FIG. 27 is a schematic illustration of an apparatus for gas storage.

FIG. 28 is a schematic illustration of an apparatus for gas storage.

Figure S1 is a graph showing the potential energy surface along the first vibrational eigenvector of the hydrogen bond between CO₂ and an OH group of NOTT-300 (Al);

Figure S2 (a) illustrates PXRD patterns for the Rietveld refinement of the as-synthesized NOTT-300 (Al)-solvate [λ=0.826949(2) Å].

Figure S2 (b) illustrates PXRD patterns for higher angle data (2θ=22.5-55°) scaled up to show the quality of the fit between the observed and the calculated patterns.

Figure S3 (a) illustrates PXRD patterns for the Rietveld refinement of the CO₂-loaded NOTT-300 (Al).3.2CO_(2 [1)=0.826126(2) Å].

Figure S3 (b) illustrates PXRD patterns for higher angle data (2θ=22.5-60°) scaled up to show the quality of fit between the observed and the calculated patterns.

Figure S4 (a) illustrates PXRD patterns for the Rietveld refinement of the SO₂-loaded NOTT-300 (Al).4SO₂ [λ=0.826126(2) Å].

Figure S4 (b) illustrates PXRD patterns for higher angle data (2θ=22.5-55°) scaled up to show the quality of fit between the observed and the calculated patterns.

Figure S5 (a) provides a comparison of the powder diffraction patterns for original, evacuated, SO₂-loaded, and final desolvated samples at 273 K.

Figure S5 (b) shows the powder diffraction patterns for higher angle data (2θ=4.5-25°) has been scaled up to show the changes upon SO₂ inclusion. NOTT-300 (Al) retains crystallinity after removal of SO₂.

Figure S6 (a) shows powder X-ray diffraction patterns for original, evacuated, CO₂-loaded, and final desolvated samples at 273 K.

Figure S6 (b) shows powder X-ray diffraction patterns for higher angle data (2θ=4.5-25°) has been scaled up confirming that NOTT-300 (Al) retains crystallinity on removal of CO₂.

Figure S7 are TEM images for NOTT-300 (Al)-solvate, TEM images confirm that the crystals have uniform morphology (˜1 μm plates)

Figure S8 provides a view of the structure of NOTT-300 (Al)-solvate along the a-axis.

Figure S9 provides a view of the structure of NOTT-300 (Al).1.0CO₂ along the c-axis (a) and a-axis (b). The structure was obtained by DFT simulation. The adsorbed CO₂ molecules in the pore channel are highlighted by the use of spacing filling style.

Figure S10 provides detailed views of —OH and —CH groups binding CO₂ in the “pocket” cavity of NOTT-300 (Al).1.0CO₂. Views along (a) the a-axis, (b), the b-axis and (c) the c-axis. The moderate hydrogen bond between O(δ−) of CO₂ and H(δ+) of —OH is shown, [O . . . H=2.335 Å]. The weak cooperative hydrogen bond between O(δ−) of CO₂ and H(δ+) from —CH is shown, [O . . . H=3.029, 3.190 Å with each occurring twice]. Therefore, each O(δ−) centre interacts with five different H(δ+) centres.

Figure S11 provides a view of the structure of NOTT-300 (Al).4.0SO₂ along the c-axis (a) and a-axis (b). The structure was obtained by Rietveld refinement of high resolution powder diffraction data collected for NOTT-300 (Al).4.0SO₂. The adsorbed SO₂ molecules in the pore channel are highlighted by the use of spacing filling style

Figure S12 provides detailed views of —OH and —CH groups binding SO₂ in the “pocket” cavity of NOTT-300 (Al).4.0SO₂. Views along (a) the a-axis, (b), the b-axis and (c) the c-axis. The modest hydrogen bond between O(δ−) of SO₂(I) and H(δ+) from —OH is shown, [O . . . H=2.376(13) Å]. The weak cooperative hydrogen bond between O(δ−) of SO₂ and H(δ+) from —CH is shown, [O . . . H=2.806(14), 2.841(17), 3.111(16), 3.725(18) Å]. Therefore, each O(δ−) centre is interacting with five different H(δ+) centres. The bond distance between S(δ+) of SO₂(I) and O(δ−) of SO₂(II) is 3.34(7) Å is shown. The S—O bond distances are 1.481(4) and 1.500(8) Å for SO₂(I) and SO₂(II), respectively. The <O—S—O angles are 117.5(II) and 109.1(9)° for SO₂(I) and SO₂(II), respectively.

Figure S13 is a Thermo Gravimetric Analysis (TGA) plot shows that the as-synthesised sample NOTT-300 (Al)-solvate loses solvent rapidly between 30 and 100° C., with a plateau observed from 100-200° C. indicating no further weight loss to give NOTT-300 (Al). The weight loss of 20.0% from NOTT-300 (Al)-solvate between 20 and 200° C. corresponds to a loss of three water molecules per aluminium (calc. 20.6 wt. %). Above 400° C. NOTT-300 (Al) starts to decompose rapidly.

Figure S14 illustrates PXRD spectra for NOTT-300(Al) under different chemical environments [λ=0.826134(2) Å];

Figure S15 shows graphs comparing of unit cell parameters of NOTT-300(Al) under different chemical environments and;

Figure S16 illustrates variable temperature PXRD spectra for NOTT-300(Al)-solvate (λ=1.54056 Å);

Figure S17 is a graph comparing of unit cell parameters for NOTT-300(Al)-solvate as a function of temperature;

Figure S18 illustrates H₂, N₂ and Ar sorption isotherms at 77 or 87 K for NOTT-300 (Al). No significant uptake was observed for these adsorption isotherms.

Figure S19 CO₂ adsorption and desorption isotherms for NOTT-300 (Al) at (a) 273 K, (b) 283 K, (c) 293 K and (d) 303 K.

Figure S20 illustrates high pressure CO₂ adsorption and desorption isotherms at 273 K for NOTT-300 (Al).

Figure S21 is a pore size distribution (PSD) plot and cumulative pore volume for NOTT-300 (Al). Data were calculated the CO₂ adsorption isotherm at 273 K using DFT/Monte Carlo methods.

Figure S22. Comparison of the gas adsorption isotherms for NOTT-300 (Al) at 273 K and 0.15 bar. NOTT-300 (Al) exhibits highly selective uptake for CO₂ and SO₂ compared with CH₄, CO, N₂, H₂, O₂ and Ar. The CO₂ selectivities, calculated from the ratio of isotherm uptakes at 0.15 bar are 88, 99, 148, 197, 85, and 160 for CH₄, CO, N₂, H₂, O₂, and Ar, respectively. The SO₂ selectivities, calculated from the ratio of isotherm uptakes at 0.15 bar are 250, 278, 418, 557, 239, and 451 for CH₄, CO, N₂, H₂, O₂ and Ar, respectively.

Figure S23 illustrates SO₂ adsorption and desorption isotherms for NOTT-300 (Al) at (a) 273 K, (b) 283 K, (c) 293 K and (d) 303 K.

Figure S24 Comparison of the gas adsorption isotherms for NOTT-300 (Al) at 283 K (a), 293 K (b), 303 K (c) and 1.0 bar. NOTT-300 (Al) exhibits highly selective uptake for CO₂ and SO₂ compared with CH₄, CO, N₂, H₂, O₂, and Ar.

Figure S25 illustrates CO₂ adsorption isotherms at 273 K for NOTT-300(Al) upon cyclic hydration and desolvation process;

Figure S26 is a comparison of INS spectra for bare NOTT-300 (Al), 0.25; H₂/Al and 0.5; H₂/Al loaded-NOTT-300 (Al).

Figure S27 is a difference INS spectra plot for forward and back scattering between bare and 0.25H₂/Al-loaded NOTT-300 (Al). The broad hump shows recoil of hydrogen; a very small and poorly defined peak at 10 meV suggests a very weak interaction. A detailed view of the low energy transfers has been scaled up in Figure b.

Figure S28 is a difference INS spectra plot for forward and back scattering between bare and 0.5; H₂/Al-loaded NOTT-300 (Al). The broad hump shows recoil of hydrogen. The peak at 10 meV is still broad and very weak, but can be seen to have increased in intensity slightly. Furthermore, an additional peak at ˜15 meV can be observed. This peak is very close to the rotational line of hydrogen (14.7 meV), further indicating that the interactions between the hydrogen and the NOTT-300 (Al) framework are very weak. A detailed view of the low energy transfers has been scaled up in Figure b.

Figure S29 provides linear fitting of Van't Hoff plots for the CO₂ adsorption isotherms at 0.5, 1.0, 1.5 and 2.0 mmol g⁻¹ loadings;

Figure S30 provides linear virial fitting plots for the adsorption isotherms for (a) CO₂ and (b) SO₂ for NOTT-300(Al) at 273 K;

Figure S31 provides non-linear virial fitting plots for the adsorption isotherms for (a) CO, (b) CH₄, (c) O₂, (d) N₂ and (e) Ar for NOTT-300(Al) at 273 K;

Figure S32 provides linear virial fitting plots for the adsorption isotherms for (a) CO₂ and (b) SO₂ for NOTT-300(Al) at 283 K;

Figure S33 provides non-linear virial fitting plots for the adsorption isotherms for (a) CO, (b) CH₄, (c) O₂, (d) N₂ and (e) Ar for NOTT-300(Al) at 283 K;

Figure S34 provides linear virial fitting plots for the adsorption isotherms for (a) CO₂ and (b) SO₂ for NOTT-300(Al) at 293 K;

Figure S35 provides non-linear virial fitting plots for the adsorption isotherms for (a) CO, (b) CH₄, (c) O₂, (d) N₂ and (e) Ar for NOTT-300 at 293 K;

Figure S36 provides linear virial fitting plots for the adsorption isotherms for (a) CO₂ and (b) SO₂ for NOTT-300(Al) at 303 K; and

Figure S37 provides non-linear virial fitting plots for the adsorption isotherms for (a) CO, (b) CH₄, (c) O₂, (d) N₂ and (e) Ar for NOTT-300(Al) at 303 K.

LIST OF EXAMPLES

For the purposes of this description the term “NOTT-300” is used to denote complexes M₂(OH)₂(C₁₆O₈H₆) (M=Al, Cr, Sb, In, Ga, and Fe) whereas the term “NOTT-300-solvate” is used to denote the solvated form of the complex. The organic ligand C₁₆O₈H₆ takes the form of biphenyl-3,3′,5′,5′ tetracarboxylate. Such structures are discussed in detail herein-below.

Example 1 Synthesis of NOTT-300 (Al)

Biphenyl-3,3′,5,5′-tetracarboxylic acid (0.06 g, 0.182 mmol), Al(NO₃)₃.9H₂O (0.34 g, 0.906 mmol), and piperazine (0.10 g, 1.26 mmol) were mixed and dispersed in a water (10.0 ml) and HNO₃ (2.8M, 2.0 ml) was then added to the resulting white slurry. The slurry was transferred into a 23 ml autoclave which was sealed and heated to 210° C. for 3 days. After cooling over 12 h to room temperature, the resulting white microcrystalline product was separated by filtration, washed with water and dried in air. Yield: 0.095 g (75%). Elemental analysis (% calc/found): Al₂O₁₆C₁₆H₂₀ (C, 36.8/36.3; H, 3.8/4.0; N, 0.0/0.0). Selected IR: ν/cm⁻¹: 3574 (m), 3425 (m), 2926 (w), 1623 (vs), 1570 (vs), 1475 (s), 1442 (s), 1346 (m), 1324 (m), 1265 (m), 1108 (m), 1003 (m), 914 (w), 807 (w), 742 (m), 702 (s), 668 (m).

Compared to traditional methods for the production of MOF materials, the synthetic conditions developed here for NOTT-300-(Al) can be viewed as constituting a green synthesis, not only because no organic solvent (e.g., DMF) is involved, but also because the ligand can be prepared from a simple oxidation reaction without using the toxic Pd(0) catalysts typically applied in Suzuki-coupling reactions to synthesise such polycarboxylate ligands.^(18, 19) Thus, this synthesis offers potential for inexpensive, feasible and environmentally-friendly scale-up.

PXRD Studies of NOTT-300 (Al)

The structure of NOTT-300 (Al)-solvate was solved from high resolution synchrotron PXRD data by ab initio methods in the chiral tetragonal space group I4₁22. NOTT-300 (Al)-solvate exhibits an open structure comprising chains of [AlO₄(OH)₂] moieties bridged by tetracarboxylate ligands L⁴⁻. The Al(III) ion in NOTT-300 (Al)-solvate is bound to six O-donors, four from carboxylates [Al—O=1.935(1) and 1.929(2) Å] and two from bridging hydroxyl groups μ₂-OH [Al—O=1.930(1) Å]. Bond valence sum calculations give a valence of approximately 0.87 for this bridging oxygen atom, confirming its protonation to form a dangling μ₂-OH group. This overall connectivity affords a porous 3D framework structure with ID channels (FIG. 2) formed by corner-sharing [AlO₄(OH)₂] octahedra linked via two mutually cis-μ₂-OH groups. Thus, the observed cis-configuration of μ₂-OH groups is responsible for the observed chirality and rigidity of the framework in NOTT-300 (Al). The rigidity of the framework structure of NOTT-300 (Al) has been confirmed by in situ variable temperature (100-483 K) PXRD data (Fig. S16). Another important consequence of the cis-configuration is the formation of square-shaped channels with hydroxyl groups protruding into them, endowing the pore environment with free hydroxyl groups over four different directions (FIG. 2 d). The approximate diameter of the channel window, taking into account the van der Waals radii of the surface atoms, is ˜6.5×6.5 Å, and these channels are filled by crystallographically-disordered water molecules which are not bound to Al(III). The total free solvent (water) volume in NOTT-300 (Al)-solvate was estimated by PLATON/SOLV* to be 42% (*Spek, A. L. Structure validation in chemical crystallography. Acta Crystallogr., Sect. D 65, 148-155 (2009)). The water molecules can be readily removed by heating, giving the desolvated and activated material NOTT-300 (Al), the PXRD of which confirms retention of the original porous structure. Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) confirms NOTT-300 (Al) to have high thermal stability with a decomposition temperature at 400° C. (Fig. S13). NOTT-300 (Al) also shows good chemical stability towards air, moisture and common organic solvents, and can be re-hydrated with retention of the framework structure (Fig. S14). Significantly, the framework porosity and surface area of NOTT-300 (Al) is retained upon multiple hydration-dehydration cycles (Fig. S25), thereby confirming the stability of this material to water.

Gas Adsorption Properties of of NOTT-300 (Al)

Al-NOTT-300 (Al) exhibits highly selective uptake for CO₂ and SO₂ compared with CH₄, CO, N₂, H₂, O₂, and Ar. The CO₂ selectivities, calculated from the ratio of initial slopes of the isotherm are 100, 86, 180, >10⁵, 70, and 137 for CH₄, CO, N₂, H₂, O₂, and Ar, respectively. The SO₂ selectivities, calculated from the ratio of the initial slopes of the isotherms are 3620, 3105, 6522, >10⁵, 2518, and 4974 for CH₄, CO, N₂, H₂, O₂, and Ar, respectively. The thermodynamic parameters Q_(st) and ΔS were calculated using the van't Hoff isochore on CO₂ adsorption isotherms measured at 273-303 K. The Q_(st) values lie in the range 27.5-28 kJ mol⁻¹ for CO₂ uptakes of 1-2 mmol g⁻¹ and increase continuously thereafter to ˜30 kJ mol⁻¹ at 4.5 mmol g⁻¹. The error in Q_(st) is estimated as 0.05-0.5 kJ mol⁻¹ as shown by the error bars. Overall, ΔS decreases continuously with increasing surface coverage over the whole loading range. The error in ΔS is estimated as 0.2-1.6 J Kmol⁻¹ as shown by the error bars.

H₂ and N₂ isotherms at 77 K and the Ar isotherm at 87 K for NOTT-300 (Al) show, surprisingly, no apparent adsorption uptakes (Fig. S18). This is probably due to diffusion effects at low temperatures caused by the narrow pore channels. In contrast, low pressure CO₂ isotherms at ambient temperatures (273-303 K) show very high uptake capacities, with a maximum value of 7.0 mmol g⁻¹ at 273 K and 1.0 bar, representing one of the highest value observed for a MOF under these conditions (FIG. 3 a).⁹ The CO₂ uptake at 0.15 bar, which is relevant to the CO₂ partial pressure in flue gas, is 2.64 mmol g⁻¹ (Fig. S22). This uptake is higher than the value (0.682 mmol g⁻¹ at 0.15 bar and 298 K) observed by other workers for H₃[(Cu₄Cl)₃(BTTri)₈]-en (H₃BTTri=1,3,5-tris(1H-1,2,3-triazol-5-yl)benzene),²² but lower than the value observed by other workers for Mg₂(dobpdc)(mmen)_(1.6)(H₂O)_(0.4) (dobpdc⁴⁻=4,4′-dioxido-3,3′-biphenyldicarboxylate; mmen=N,N′ dimethylethylenediamine) (3.14 mmol g⁻¹ at 0.15 bar and 313 K). Analysis of the CO₂ adsorption isotherm at 273 K by DFT/Monte-Carlo methods gives a surface area of 1370 m² g⁻¹, a pore size distribution centred at 5.7 Å, and a cumulative pore volume of 0.375 cm³ g⁻¹ (Fig. S21), confirming the microporous nature of this material. Saturated CO₂ uptake at 273 K and 7.0 bar was found to be 8.7 mmol g⁻¹ (Fig. S20). These data are entirely consistent with the crystallographically-determined extra-framework pore volume of 0.433 cm³ g⁻¹ and the channel window diameter of ˜6.5 Å.

Interestingly, compared with the isotherm for CO₂, (kinetic diameter 3.30 Å), the isotherm for SO₂ (kinetic diameter 4.11 Å) exhibits higher uptakes with a maximum capacity of 8.1 mmol g⁻¹ at 273 K and 1.0 bar, representing the highest value observed in the current literature. The SO₂ uptake increases sharply at low pressure (below 50 mbar) and reaches saturation at around 0.10 bar, giving a typical type-I isotherm. The very rapid uptake observed at low pressure indicates the presence of stronger interactions in NOTT-300 (Al)—SO₂ compared with NOTT-300 (Al)—CO₂. This is probably due to the high dipole moment of SO₂ (1.62 D compared with 0 D for CO₂) which results in stronger interactions of SO₂ with the pore surface of NOTT-300 (Al). The density of adsorbed CO₂ and SO₂ in NOTT-300 (Al) is unknown. By using a density of 1.032 g cm⁻³ of liquid CO₂ at 253 K or a density of 1.458 g cm⁻³ of liquid SO₂ at its boiling point of 263 K, it can be deduced that the volumes of CO₂ and SO₂ adsorbed in NOTT-300 (Al) at 1.0 bar and 273 K are 0.298 and 0.356 cm³ g⁻¹, respectively. This corresponds to fillings of 69% and 82%, respectively, of the total crystallographically-determined pore volume of 0.433 cm³ g⁻¹. At 7.0 bar, up to 89% of the total pore volume in NOTT-300 (Al) is filled by CO₂ molecules. These values are entirely reasonable considering that in each case the adsorption temperature lies above the relevant boiling point; moreover, in an isotherm experiment not all the void space within a porous material is necessarily accessible to the gaseous substrate. In contrast, under the same conditions the isotherms for CH₄, CO, N₂, H₂, O₂, and Ar show only surface adsorption by NOTT-300 (Al), with very low uptake of gas (0.04-0.25 mmol g⁻¹). Significantly, comparison of the gas adsorption isotherms (FIG. 3 a) clearly shows ultra-high selectivities for CO₂ and SO₂ (e.g., CO2/CH₄: 100; CO₂/N₂: 180; CO₂/H₂: >10⁵; SO₂/CH₄: 3620; SO₂/N₂: 6522; SO₂/H₂: >10⁵), indicating the potential of NOTT-300 (Al) for the selective capture of these harmful gases.

Gas adsorption isotherms (CO₂, SO₂, CH₄, N₂, CO, O₂, Ar, H₂) for NOTT-300 (Al) have also been measured at more ambient temperatures (i.e., 283, 293 and 303 K), where highly selective uptakes for CO₂ and SO₂ are confirmed (Fig. S24), and the corresponding desorption isotherms exhibit full reversibility without hysteresis. This suggests that the adsorbed CO₂ and SO₂ gases can be readily released and that NOTT-300 (Al) can be re-generated at ambient temperatures without the need for heating, a factor which reduces the energy efficiency of traditional amine-based carbon capture systems.

In Situ Inelastic Neutron Scatterine and Powder Diffraction Studies of of NOTT-300 (Al)

Direct visualisation of the interaction between CO₂ molecules and the NOTT-300 (Al) host is crucial to understanding the detailed binding mechanism and hence the observed high selectivities. Inelastic neutron scattering (INS) is a powerful neutron spectroscopy technique which has been used widely to investigate the H₂ binding interactions within various storage systems by exploiting the high neutron scattering cross-section of hydrogen (82.02 barns). However, this technique cannot directly detect the CO₂ binding interaction within a carbon capture system because the scattering cross-sections for carbon (5.551 barns) and oxygen (4.232 barns) are too small to obtain a clear neutron scattering signal. In this study, INS and DFT been successfully combined to visualise captured CO₂ molecules within NOTT-300 (Al) by investigating the change in the dynamics of the hydrogen atoms of the local MOF structure, including those of the hydroxyl groups and benzene rings of the ligand (FIG. 4). Calculation of the INS spectra from DFT vibrational analysis can be readily achieved, and the DFT calculations relate directly to the INS spectra, and, in the case of solid state calculations, there are no approximations other than the use of DFT eigenvectors and eigenvalues to determine the spectral intensities.²⁴ Comparison of INS spectra, measured at temperatures below 5 K to minimise the thermal motion of the adsorbed CO₂ and the framework host, reveals two major increases in peak intensity on going from bare NOTT-300 (Al) to NOTT-300 (Al).1.0CO₂: peak I occurs at low energy transfer (30 meV) and peak II at high energy transfer (125 meV). Moreover, the peaks in the range 100-160 meV are slightly shifted to higher energies in NOTT-300 (Al).1.0CO₂ (FIG. 4 b), indicating a stiffening of the motion of the NOTT-300 (Al) host upon CO₂ adsorption. To understand these changes, DFT calculations have been used to simulate the INS spectra and optimise the structures for NOTT-300 (Al) and NOTT-300 (Al).1.0CO₂. The INS spectra derived from these calculations show good agreement with experimental spectra and confirm that the adsorbed CO₂ molecules interact end-on to the hydroxyl groups. The O . . . H distance between the CO₂ molecule and the hydroxyl group is 2.335 Å, indicating a moderate-to-weak hydrogen bond (See Table S13 in the supplementary section of this specification). The optimised C—O bond distances in CO₂ are 1.183 Å(hydrogen-bonded end) and 1.178 Å (free end), and the <OCO bond angle is 180°. Each adsorbed CO₂ molecule is also surrounded by four aromatic C—H groups, forming weak cooperative supramolecular interactions between O(δ−) of CO₂ and H(δ+) from —CH [O . . . H=3.029, 3.190 Å, each occurring twice]. Specifically, peak I can be assigned to the O—H groups wagging perpendicular to the Al—O—Al direction, attributed to the presence of the CO₂, and peak II to the wagging of the four aromatic C—H groups on four benzene rings adjacent to each CO₂ molecule in conjunction with the wagging of the OH group along the Al—O—Al direction (FIG. 4 d and film in SI). Thus, a total of five hydrogen atoms H(δ+) interact cooperatively with the O(δ−) charge centres of CO₂ molecules in the channel via moderate-to-weak hydrogen bonds and supramolecular interactions.

The preferred binding sites for CO₂ molecules within NOTT-300 (Al) have also been determined by in situ PXRD analysis which also confirms end-on binding of CO₂ molecules to the hydroxyl group [O . . . H=2.298(10) Å]. The weaker supramolecular contacts from surrounding C—H groups to the O(δ−) charged centres of CO₂ molecules in the channel [O . . . H=3.021(31), 3.171(22) Å, each occurring twice] are also observed. This PXRD analysis is in excellent agreement with the INS model obtained independently from DFT modelling with regard to both hydrogen-bonding and the combination of supramolecular binding interactions. Additionally, a second CO₂(II) site has been identified in NOTT-300 (Al).3.2CO₂ studied by PXRD. This second site interacts principally with the first CO₂ via dipole interaction [O(I) . . . C(II)=3.920 Å], forming an edge-on intermolecular CO₂ network [O(I) . . . O(II)=2.713(28) Å] along the pore channel that is reminiscent of solid CO₂ (FIG. 4 c).

In order to understand why low uptakes are observed for some gases while high selectivity for CO₂ is achieved, the interactions between H₂ and NOTT-300 (Al) were probed The INS spectra of NOTT-300 (Al).1.0H₂ show an overall increase in signal upon H₂ loading, indicating adsorption of H₂ by NOTT-300 (Al) at below 40 K (Fig. S26). The difference INS spectra, measured at below 5 K, between bare NOTT-300 (Al) and NOTT-300 (Al).1.0H₂ show a series of features that resemble the signal of liquid molecular H₂. Significantly, the sharp rotational peak usually observed around 14.7 meV as a prominent feature in the INS of molecular H₂ in the solid state or adsorbed on surface is not observed here. This suggests a ID fluid-like recoil motion of the H₂ along the channel^(25,26) consistent with extremely weak interactions and low uptake of H₂ in NOTT-300 (Al) (Figs. S27, S28).

In order to determine the reasons for the high selectivity and high uptake capacity, the preferred binding sites for SO₂ molecules within NOTT-300 (Al) have been determined by in situ PXRD. The in situ PXRD confirms the retention of the structure of NOTT-300 (Al) upon inclusion and subsequent removal of SO₂ (FIG. 5 a), thereby confirming the high stability of NOTT-300 (Al) in the presence of corrosive SO₂. Indeed, the uptake of SO₂ in NOTT-300 (Al) is entirely reversible with no apparent loss of capacity on recycling. For NOTT-300 (Al).4SO₂ (at 1.0 bar), two distinct, equally-occupied binding sites (I and II) were located within the channel (FIG. 5 b): SO₂(I) occupies the same position as CO₂ and interacts with —OH groups via its O(δ−) charged centre [OSO . . . HOAl=2.376(13) Å], which also forms weak interactions with four —CH groups from neighbouring benzene rings [OSO . . . HC=2.806(14), 2.841(17), 3.111(16), 3.725(18) Å]. Thus, as for CO₂, a total of five cooperative hydrogen bonds accommodate SO₂(I) in a “pocket-like” cavity. A second site, identified as SO₂(II), was observed between two SO₂(I) molecules. However, no hydrogen bonding between the SO₂(II) and —OH or —CH groups are apparent; rather, the O(δ−) centre of SO₂(II) interacts with the S(δ+) charge centre of SO₂(I), thus stabilising an SO₂(I,II) intermolecular chain via O(δ−) . . . S(δ+) dipole interactions [O(I) . . . S(II)=3.34(7) Å](FIG. 5 b) within the channel. The S═O bond distances for SO₂(I) and SO₂(II) are 1.481(4) and 1.500(8) Å, respectively, with corresponding <O═S═O angles of 117.5(II) and 109.1(9)°. The structural investigation of NOTT-300 (Al).4SO₂ represents a distinct crystallographic study of a SO₂-loaded MOF and gives important insights into the SO₂ adsorption mechanism.

Despite the small total bound scattering cross section of sulphur (1.026 barns), comparison of the INS spectra below 5 K reveals two major increases in peak intensity on going from bare NOTT-300 (Al) to NOTT-300 (Al).2SO₂ (or NOTT-300 (Al).3SO₂): peak I occurs at low energy transfer (30-50 meV) and peak II at high energy transfer (125 meV), similar to that observed in the INS spectra for CO₂-loaded NOTT-300 (Al) (FIG. 6 b). Moreover, immediate stiffening of the motion of the NOTT-300 (Al) host was observed upon SO₂ inclusion, as evidenced by the slight shift in INS peak to higher energies in NOTT-300 (Al).2SO₂ and NOTT-300 (Al).3SO₂ (FIG. 6 a). DFT simulation has also been performed to optimise the structures of both NOTT-300 (Al) and NOTT-300 (Al).2SO₂ materials. The simulated INS spectra show good agreement with the experimental spectra and are consistent with the adsorbed SO₂ molecules interacting end-on to the hydroxyl groups via the hydrogen bond interactions [O . . . H=2.338 Å] with additional supramolecular contacts with the adjacent aromatic C—H groups [O . . . H=2.965-3.238 Å] (FIG. 6 c). The INS/DFT results are entirely consistent with the PXRD analysis and provide key insights into the dynamics of the NOTT-300 (Al) host upon SO₂ inclusion.

Selective Hydrocarbon Uptake of NOTT-300 (Al)

TABLE A Selectivity 273K 283K 293K 303K C₂H₂/C₂H₄ 4.20 2.52 2.06 1.56

Structure Determination and Refinement for NOTT-300 (Al)-Solvate, NOTT-300 (Al).3.2CO, and NOTT-300 (Al).4SO₂

High resolution powder diffraction data were collected on Beamline I11 at Diamond Light Source by using multi-analysing-crystal detectors (MACs)²⁸ and an in-situ gas cell system. The powder pattern was firstly indexed on a body-centred tetragonal lattice and the independent unit cell parameters were refined using TOPAS.²⁹ The body centring and the reflection condition 00l: l=4n indicates that the space group is one of the enantiomeric pair I4₁22 and I4₃22. In the absence of any component capable of directing chirality, the product is expected to be a 1:1 racemic mixture. The structure solution was initially established in space group I4₁22 by charge flipping using the program Superflip,³⁰ and further developed from subsequent difference Fourier analysis using TOPAS. The final structure refinement was carried out using the Rietveld method²⁹ with isotropic displacement parameters for all atoms. A total of 40 disordered water molecules per unit cell were found within the pore channel and included in the final structure refinement for NOTT-300 (Al)-solvate. Upon desolvation and SO₂ loading, we observe neither major changes to cell parameters nor extra features in the patterns, suggesting that there is no structural phase change during the experiment. However, upon SO₂ loading, there are significant increases in the peak intensities at ˜6.2, 10.2, 12 and 14° 2θ, indicating that the SO₂ molecules are adsorbed into the material, and that the overall microscopic ordering of the SO₂/host system is increasing. A Monte-Carlo-based simulated annealing technique in which the guest SO₂ molecules were treated as rigid bodies was used to locate their positions in NOTT-300 (Al).4SO₂. Two independent SO₂ sites were found each with half occupancy. The 502 content was refined giving a stoichiometry of 1.98(2) molecules of SO₂ per Al, slightly higher than the experimental value of 1.7 SO₂ per Al. The occupancy of the first CO₂ site was determined to be 0.865(9) and the second CO₂ site 0.727(7), leading to a total refined CO₂ stoichiometry of 1.592(12) in excellent agreement with the experimental value of 1.6 CO₂ per Al. The final stage of the Rietveld refinement involved soft restraints to the C—C bond lengths within the benzene rings. Rigid body refinement was applied to the CO₂ and SO₂ molecules in the pore.

Crystal Data for NOTT-300 (Al)-Solvate

[Al₂(OH)₂(C₁₆H₆O₈)](H₂O)₆. White powder. Tetragonal, space group I4₁22, a=b=14.82958(6), c=11.77317(5) Å, V=2589.11(3) Å³, M=522.29, T=293(2) K, Z=4. The final Rietveld plot corresponds to satisfactory crystal structure model (R_(Bragg)=0.056) and profile (R_(p)=0.052 and R_(wp)=0.072) indicators with a goodness-of-fit parameter of 1.345. Final fractional coordinates for NOTT-300 (Al)-solvate are listed in Table S1.

TABLE S1 Atomic positions for non-hydrogen atoms in NOTT-300 (Al)-solvate x y z B_(iso) (Å²) Al1 0.69426(5) 0.30574(5) 0.5 0.72(13) O1 0.75744(13) 0.25 0.625 0.51(12) O2 0.89782(9) 0.28675(9) 0.99869(15) 0.51(12) O3 0.62165(10) 0.37371(10) 0.39436(12) 0.51(12) C1 0.59280(35) 0.36039(14) 0.69453(19) 0.70(13) C2 0.54498(10) 0.43181(7) 0.75722(10) 0.70(13) C3 0.5 0.5 0.69649(14) 0.70(13) C4 0.54071(10) 0.428618(71) 0.87716(8) 0.70(13) C5 0.5 0.5 0.93474(11) 0.70(13) O1w 0.91080(23) 0.80489(16) 0.94077(28) 21.6(2) O2w 0.45734(19) 0.73953(30) 0.06123(32) 11.9(3) O3w 0.13041(22) 0.29586(24) 0.53782(37) 35.7(3)

Crystal Data for NOTT-300 (Al).3.2CO₁

[Al₂(OH)₂(C₁₆H₆O₈)](CO₂)_(3.2). White powder. Tetragonal, space group I4₁22, a=b=14.82432(6), c=11.80570(5) Å, V=2594.43(3) Å³, M=550.03, T=273(2) K, Z=4. The final Rietveld plot corresponds to satisfactory crystal structure model (R_(Bragg)=0.025) and profile (R_(p)=0.043 and R_(wp)=0.059) indicators with a goodness-of-fit parameter of 1.531. Final fractional coordinates for NOTT-300 (Al).3.2CO₂ are listed in Table S2.

TABLE S2 Atomic positions for NOTT-300 (Al)•3.2CO₂ X y z B_(iso) (Å²) Al1 0.30694(4) −0.30694(4) 0.5 0.93(40) O1 0.75117(13) 0.25 6.625 0.82(40) H1 0.8123(17) 0.25 0.625 0.75(40) O2 0.62152(22) 0.37975(22) 0.60276(28) 0.82(40) O3 0.60511(22) 0.28380(22) 0.75032(28) 0.82(40) C1 0.59215(19) 0.36044(15) 0.70222(15) 1.37(40) C2 0.54078(8) 0.43003(6) 0.76456(13) 1.37(40) C3 0.5 0.5 0.70584(14) 1.37(40) H3 0.5 0.5 0.6125(7) 1.37(40) C4 0.54078(8) 0.43003(6) 0.88199(13) 1.37(40) H4 0.5675(4) 0.3842(6) 0.9205(6) 1.37(40) C5 0.5 0.5 0.94071(14) 1.37(40) C1_1 1.0335(25) 0.25 0.6676(12) 15.1(2) O1_1 0.9673(23) 0.25 0.625 18.7(5) O2_1 1.0998(22) 0.25 0.7102(24) 39.4(8) C1_2 0.25 0.35535 0.375 18.3(2) O1_2 0.32821 0.35535 0.375 38.4(8)

Crystal Data for NOTT-300 (Al).4SO₂

[Al₂(OH)₂(C₁₆H₆O₈)](SO₂)₄. White powder. Tetragonal, space group I4₁22, a=b=14.84740(10), c=11.80564(8) Å, V=2602.50(4) Å³, M=670.46, T=273(2) K, Z=4. The final Rietveld plot corresponds to satisfactory crystal structure model (R_(Bragg)=0.024) and profile (R_(p)=0.044 and R_(wp)=0.057) indicators with a goodness-of-fit parameter of 1.293. Final fractional coordinates for NOTT-300 (Al).4SO₂ are listed in Table S3.

TABLE S3 Atomic positions for NOTT-300 (Al)•4SO₂ X y z B_(iso) (Å²) Al1 0.30668(4) −0.30668(4) 0.5 0.83(11) O1 0.75093(11) 0.25 0.625 0.50(11) H1 0.8094(7) 0.2737(13) 0.6182(19) 0.75(17) 02 0.87680(8) 0.12169(8) 0.10281(9) 0.50(11) O3 0.89634(7) 0.21365(7) 0.25360(13) 0.50(11) C1 0.85735(12) 0.09466(13) 0.79858(16) 0.90(12) C2 0.53958(11) 0.43084(7) 0.75958(9) 0.90(12) C3 0.5 0.5 0.69441(10) 0.90(12) H3 0.5 0.5 0.6125(7) 1.09(14) C4 0.54005(7) 0.42960(5) 0.87811(9) 0.90(12) H4 0.57318 0.38162 0.90735 1.09(14) C5 0.5 0.5 0.93693(9) 0.90(12) S1 0.062518 0.257889 −0.415951 15.1(2) O1s −0.036130 0.243180 −0.416293 5.8(2) O2s 0.110299 0.250886 −0.525706 39.4(8) S2 0.103150 0.184862 −0.037573 18.3(2) O3s 0.117697 0.239213 −0.143103 38.4(8) O4s 0.123069 0.242537 0.063692 24.4(4)

A detailed description has been given above for an aluminium hydroxyl metal organic framework complex. Analogues to this complex have also been synthesised based on indium, antimony, chromium and gallium. A metal organic framework has also be synthesised that contains both aluminium and iron functional groups. These analogue complexes also exhibit the same high uptake and selectivity for XO₂ gases (X=C, S, O).

Transmission Electron Microscopic (TEM) Study on NOTT-300 (Al).

A TEM image shows the crystals to have uniform morphology of ˜1 μm plates (Fig. S7 a,b), and a high resolution (HRTEM) image confirms the presence of extended crystalline planes (Fig. S7 c).

Synchrotron Powder Diffraction Studies of Solvated NOTT-300

To investigate the chemical stability of desolvated NOTT-300, an important feature for a capture material, PXRD patterns were collected for a range of NOTT-300 samples under variable chemical environments. Some of these are illustrated in Figure S14. After the collection of an original pattern for the as-synthesised sample, NOTT-300 solvate was degassed at 150° C. to generate desolvated NOTT-300. The desolvated material was then separated into ten portions, each of which was exposed to air for one month, or immersed in water, methanol, ethanol, CHCl₃, CH₃CN, DMF, THF, benzene or toluene for one week. Comparison of the resultant PXRD patterns confirms the excellent stability of the desolvated NOTT-300 material under air, water and common organic solvents. Figure S15 provides an illustration comparing of unit cell parameters of NOTT-300 under different chemical environments.

Variable Temperature Powder Diffraction of NOTT-300 (Al)

To investigate the possible framework phase change of NOTT-300 (Al)-solvate as a function of temperature, variable temperature PXRD patterns were collected at 100-483 K for NOTT-300 (Al)-solvate (Fig. S16). Comparison of the PXRD patterns confirms that there is no framework phase transition over this temperature range and the framework of NOTT-300 (Al) remains intact after removal of the water molecules in the channels. The lattice parameters were refined via Le Bail methods, and results are summarised in Table S3. The overall change in the unit cell volume is less than 1.0%, confirming the rigidity of the framework. Figure S16 provides variable temperature PXRD patterns for NOTT-300 (Al)-solvate (λ=1.54056 Å). Figure S17. Unit cell parameters for NOTT-300 (Al)-solvate as a function of temperature.

TABLE S4 Summary of Le Bail refinement results and unit cell parameters for NOTT-300 (Al)-solvate. Unit cell a, b (Å) c (Å) V (Å³) change (%) 100 K 14.78200(30) 11.76100(35) 2569.87(13) 0.000 140 K 14.78821(29) 11.76287(33) 2572.44(12) 0.100 180 K 14.79348(30) 11.76458(34) 2574.64(13) 0.186 220 K 14.80187(30) 11.76717(34) 2578.13(13) 0.321 260 K 14.81512(30) 11.77028(35) 2583.43(13) 0.527 273 K 14.82847(31) 11.77667(37) 2589.50(13) 0.764 303 K 14.83686(30) 11.77726(36) 2592.56(13) 0.883 333 K 14.83822(31) 11.77750(38) 2593.09(14) 0.904 363 K 14.83625(48) 11.78236(61) 2593.46(21) 0.918 383 K 14.83288(42) 11.78464(54) 2592.79(19) 0.892 403 K 14.82777(38) 11.78762(47) 2591.66(17) 0.848 423 K 14.81612(45) 11.81073(51) 2592.66(19) 0.887 443 K 14.81299(54) 11.81873(59) 2593.32(23) 0.912 463 K 14.81193(51) 11.82149(60) 2593.55(22) 0.921 483 K 14.8186(13) 11.8244(15) 2596.54(56) 1.04

Exposure of NOTT-300 (Al) to Water.

The NOTT-300 (Al)-solvate material was loaded into an IGA and degassed at 120° C. and 10⁻¹⁰ bar for 24 h to give the fully desolvated NOTT-300 (Al) material. A CO₂ adsorption isotherm was then measured at 273 K and up to 1.0 bar (noted as first cycle). The desolvated sample was then exposed to high temperature (90-100° C.) water vapour for 1 h as a humidity treatment. The hydrated sample was then loaded into IGA and degassed again at 120° C. and 10⁻¹⁰ bar for 24 h to give desolvated NOTT-300 (Al) material. A second CO₂ adsorption isotherm was then measured at 273 K and up to 1.0 bar (noted as the second cycle). The same humidity treatment (hydration), degassing (de-hydration), and CO₂ adsorption were repeated twice more (noted as third and fourth cycles). Comparisons of these four CO₂ adsorption isotherms confirm that there is no apparent loss of uptake capacity and that the pore surface can be fully regenerated, showing that the framework has good stability upon exposure to the above humidity cycle. Figure S25 illustrates the CO₂ adsorption isotherms at 273 K for NOTT-300 (Al) upon cyclic hydration and desolvation process.

DFT Modelling and Simulations on NOTT-300

The vibrational properties of the NOTT-300 (Al) were calculated using a combination of density functional theory (DFT) and plane-wave pseudopotential methods as implemented in the CASTEP code,² using ultra-soft pseudopotentials with a plane-wave energy cutoff of 380 eV. Calculations were performed under the PBE approximation³ for exchange and correlation. The unit cell used has a volume of 2589.2 Å³ and contains 144 and 156 atoms for the bare and CO₂-loaded materials, respectively. The wave functions were sampled according to the Monkhorst-Pack scheme with a k-points mesh of spacing ˜0.05 Å⁻¹. The normal modes of the solid were determined from dynamical matrices calculated using finite displacements, by numerical differentiation. The INS spectra was the calculated using the aClimax software.⁴

The calculation of the bare material is computationally stable, in the calculation of the vibrational frequencies, all the frequencies are positive. Figure S1 illustrates the potential energy surface along the first vibrational eigenvector of the hydrogen bond between CO₂ and the —OH moieties. At the centre it is clear that the potential would give an unstable configuration from a classical point of view. The calculated solution of the Schrödinger equation gives the energy levels at 14.2 and 81 cm⁻¹. The zero point energy is higher than the local maximum so that from a quantum point of view, the system is in a stable equilibrium. In the calculation of the MOF material loaded with four CO₂ molecules per unit cell (Fig. S1), corresponding to NOTT-300 (Al).1.0CO₂, 8 imaginary frequency modes were found. Following the methodology previously used in MOF modelling,⁵ we calculated the potential energy surface (PES) along each of the negative frequency modes (corresponding to the rocking motion of the CO₂ unit). Figure S1 shows the potential energy surface (PES) for the hydrogen bond between CO2 and —OH group of the NOTT-300 (Al).1.0CO₂. The obtained PES confirms that the zero-point energy (ZPE) level (the ground state) lies at an energy above the local minimum calculated by DFT. This means that these PES, although corresponding to an unstable structure from a static classical point of view, are indeed stable structures from the quantum mechanical view.

The location of SO₂ molecules in NOTT-300 has been optimised by DFT modelling based on the measured INS spectra. The DFT calculation was performed using the same settings as in the case of CO₂. Notably, a high symmetry configuration, which does not take into account the disorder of SO₂ molecules in the channel, was used.

Analysis and Derivation of the Isosteric Heat of Adsorption for CO₂ in NOTT-300 (Al).

To estimate the isosteric enthalpies (ΔH) for CO₂ adsorption, all isotherms at 273-303 K were fitted to the van't Hoff equation (1):

$\begin{matrix} {\frac{{\ln (p)}}{\left( {1/T} \right)} = {- \frac{\Delta \; H}{R}}} & (1) \end{matrix}$

where p is pressure, T is the temperature, R is the real gas constant. Selected linear fitting plots at 0.5, 1.0, 1.5 and 2.0 mmol g⁻¹ are shown in Figure S25. All linear fittings show R² above 0.999, indicating consistency of the isotherm data.

Figure S29 provides linear fitting of Van't Hoff plots for the CO₂ adsorption isotherms at 0.5, 1.0, 1.5 and 2.0 mmol g⁻¹ loadings.

Calculation of Henry's Law Selectivity for Gas Adsorption in NOTT-300.

To estimate the selectivity of CO₂ and SO₂ over other gases at zero surface coverage, all low pressure isotherm data at 273 K were fitted using a linear virial-type expression (2) employed previously to model gas sorption in MOFs. For the isotherms with overall low uptakes, where a good linear fitting cannot be obtained at low pressure, the non-linear virial type expression (3) was employed to achieve reasonable virial fitting with inclusion of data at relatively high pressure.⁶

ln(n/p)=A ₀ +A ₁ n  (2)

ln(n/p)=A+A ₁ n+A ₂ n ²+  (3)

where p is the pressure expressed, n is the amount adsorbed, A_(i) are virial coefficients, and i represent the number of coefficients required to adequately describe the isotherms with low uptakes. The results of the fitting for all isotherms give R² greater than 0.99 and the Henry constants for each component were extracted from the virial coefficients (Tables S5).

The Henry's constant (K_(H)) can be extracted from the values of the virial coefficients A₀ using expression (4).

K _(H)=exp(A ₀)  (4)

The Henry's Law selectivity for component i(CO₂ or SO₂) over other gas component j(CO, CH₄, N₂, O₂, Ar or H₂) was estimated based on the ratio of their Henry's constants (equation 5). The results are listed in Table S6. The selectivity data from virial fittings and Henry's Law analysis are confined to the zero surface coverage situations.

S _(ij) =K _(Hi) /K _(Hj)  (5)

TABLE S5 Virial fitting results and Henry's constants K_(H) for CO₂, SO₂, CH₄, N₂, H₂, O₂ and Ar in NOTT-300 (Al) from isotherm data at 273 K. CO₂ SO₂ CO CH₄ N₂ H₂ O₂ Ar A₀/ln(mol g⁻¹ −14.11(8)  6.22(40) −20.27(3) −20.34(3) −20.81(1) n.a. * −20.04(2) −20.57(2) Pa⁻¹) K_(H)/mol g⁻¹ 7.45(57) 508(167)   1.57(5) 1.46(4) 9.14(10) 1.98(2) 1.16(2) Pa⁻¹ ×10⁻⁷ ×10−⁹ ×10⁻⁹ ×10⁻¹⁰ ×10⁻⁹ ×10⁻⁹ Fitting R² 0.990 0.996 >0.999 >0.999 >0.999 >0.999 >0.999 Residual 0.00075 0.034 0.022 0.022 0.016 0.011 0.030 error * The uptake of H₂ isotherm at 273 K (below 0.01 wt %) is too low to obtain a reasonable virial fitting curve, and the Henry constant is therefore considered to be approximately zero.

TABLE S6 Virial fitting results and Henry's constants K_(H) for CO₂, SO₂, CH₄, N₂, H₂, O₂ and Ar in NOTT-300 (Al) from isotherm data at 283 K. CO₂ SO₂ CO CH₄ N₂ H₂ O₂ Ar A₀/ln(mol g⁻¹ −14.57(5)  5.75(50) −20.38(2) −20.29(2) −20.84(1) n.a.* −20.11(2) −20.70(3) Pa⁻¹ K_(H)/mol g⁻¹ 4.70(24) 314(123)   1.41(3) 1.54(3) 8.88(9) 1.85(4) 1.03(4) Pa⁻¹ ×10⁻⁷ ×10⁻⁹ ×10⁻⁹ ×10⁻¹⁰ ×10⁻⁹ ×10⁻⁹ Fitting R² 0.994 0.991 >0.999 >0.999 >0.999 >0.999 >0.999 Residual error 0.00050 0.141 0.021 0.013 0.024 0.023 0.012 *The uptake of H₂ isotherm at 283 K (below 0.01 wt %) is too low to obtain a reasonable virial fitting curve, and the Henry constant is therefore considered to be approximately zero.

TABLE S7 Virial fitting results and Henry's constants K_(H) for CO₂, SO₂, CH₄, N₂, H₂, O₂ and Ar in NOTT-300 (Al) from isotherm data at 293 K. CO₂ SO₂ CO CH₄ N₂ H₂ O₂ Ar A₀/ln(mol g⁻¹ −15.52(3)   5.46(126) −20.37(2) −20.23(3) −20.78(3) n.a.* −19.98(2) −20.69(2) Pa⁻¹) K_(H)/mol g⁻¹ 1.82(6) 235(168)   1.42(2) 1.63(4) 9.42(22) 2.10(5) 1.03(2) Pa⁻¹ ×10⁻⁷ ×10⁻⁹ ×10⁻⁹ ×10⁻¹⁰ ×10⁻⁹ ×10⁻⁹ Fitting R² 0.997 0.977 >0.999 >0.999 >0.999 >0.999 >0.999 Residual error 0.000030 0.024 0.020 0.013 0.011 0.017 0.015 *The uptake of H₂ isotherm at 283 K (below 0.01 wt %) is too low to obtain a reasonable virial fitting curve, and the Henry constant is therefore considered to be approximately zero.

TABLE S8 Virial fitting results and Henry's constants K_(H) for CO₂, SO₂, CH₄, N₂, H₂, O₂ and Ar in NOTT-300 (Al) from isotherm data at 303 K. CO₂ SO₂ CO CH₄ N₂ H₂ O₂ Ar A₀/ln(mol g⁻¹ −16.44(1) 4.30(100) −20.27(2) −20.15(2) −20.73(1) n.a.* −20.03(1) −20.42(

Pa⁻¹) K_(H)/mol g⁻¹ 7.25(8) 73.7(465) 1.57(2) 1.77(4) 9.89(10) 2.04(1) 1.35(2

Pa⁻¹ ×10⁻⁸ ×10⁻⁹ ×10⁻⁹ ×10⁻¹⁰ ×10⁻⁹ ×10⁻⁹ Fitting R² 0.994 0.976 >0.999 >0.999 >0.999 >0.999 >0.99

Residual error 0.000072 0.050 0.016 0.016 0.0048 0.022 0.013 *The uptake of H₂ isotherm at 283 K (below 0.01 wt %) is too low to obtain a reasonable virial fitting curve, and the Henry constant is therefore considered to be approximately zero.

indicates data missing or illegible when filed

TABLE S9 Summary of gas adsorption selectivity data obtained by two methods: (i)^(a) the ratio of slopes of initial adsorption isotherm plot; (ii)^(b) Henry's Law analysis at 273 K. Selectivity ratio Isotherm plot slop Henry's Law analysis CO₂/CO  86 475  CO₂/CH₄  100 510  CO₂/N₂  180 815  CO₂/H₂   >10⁵ >10⁵ CO₂/O₂  70 376  CO₂/Ar  137 642  SO₂/CO 3105 >10⁵ SO₂/CH₄ 3620 >10⁵ SO₂/N₂ 6522 >10⁵ SO₂/H₂   >10⁵ >10⁵ SO₂/O₂ 2518 >10⁵ SO₂/Ar 4974 >10⁵ ^(a)This method represents the selectivity at low pressure region (50-350 mbar) and is close to the situation from the direct comparison of gas uptakes. ^(b)This method represents the extreme selectivity at zero surface coverage of a given material, and therefore is higher than the values from method (i). Selectivity data obtained from method (i) are reported in the main text.

TABLE S10 Summary of gas adsorption selectivity data obtained by two methods: (i)^(a) the ratio of slopes of initial adsorption isotherm plot; (ii)^(b) Henry's Law analysis at 283 K. Selectivity ratio Isotherm plot slop Henry's Law analysis CO₂/CO  67 333  CO₂/CH₄  57 305  CO₂/N₂  110 529  CO₂/H₂   >10⁵ >10⁵ CO₂/O₂  54 254  CO₂/Ar  90 456  SO₂/CO 3586 >10⁵ SO₂/CH₄ 3061 >10⁵ SO₂/N₂ 5864 >10⁵ SO₂/H₂   >10⁵ >10⁵ SO₂/O₂ 2880 >10⁵ SO₂/Ar 4831 >10⁵ ^(a)This method represents the selectivity at low pressure region (50-350 mbar) and is close to the situation from the direct comparison of gas uptakes. ^(b)This method represents the extreme selectivity at zero surface coverage of a given material, and therefore is higher than the values from method (i).

TABLE S11 Summary of gas adsorption selectivity data obtained by two methods: (i)^(a) the ratio of slopes of initial adsorption isotherm plot; (ii)^(b) Henry's Law analysis at 293 K. Selectivity ratio Isotherm plot slop Henry's Law analysis CO₂/CO  45 128  CO₂/CH₄  39 112  CO₂/N₂  72 193  CO₂/H₂   >10⁵ >10⁵ CO₂/O₂  39  87 CO₂/Ar  64 177  SO₂/CO 2854 >10⁵ SO₂/CH₄ 2464 >10⁵ SO₂/N₂ 4545 >10⁵ SO₂/H₂   >10⁵ >10⁵ SO₂/O₂ 2490 >10⁵ SO₂/Ar 4070 >10⁵ ^(a)This method represents the selectivity at low pressure region (50-350 mbar) and is close to the situation from the direct comparison of gas uptakes. ^(b)This method represents the extreme selectivity at zero surface coverage of a given material, and therefore is higher than the values from method (i).

TABLE S12 Summary of gas adsorption selectivity data obtained by two methods: (i)^(a) the ratio of slopes of initial adsorption isotherm plot; (ii)^(b) Henry's Law analysis at 303 K. Selectivity ratio Isotherm plot slop Henry's Law analysis CO₂/CO  32  46 CO₂/CH₄  31  41 CO₂/N₂  46  73 CO₂/H₂   >10⁵ >10⁵ CO₂/O₂  30  36 CO₂/Ar  41  54 SO₂/CO 1586 >10⁵ SO₂/CH₄ 1510 >10⁵ SO₂/N₂ 2252 >10⁵ SO₂/H₂   >10⁵ >10⁵ SO₂/O₂ 1458 >10⁵ SO₂/Ar 2002 >10⁵ ^(a)This method represents the selectivity at low pressure region (50-350 mbar) and is close to the situation from the direct comparison of gas uptakes. ^(b)This method represents the extreme selectivity at zero surface coverage of a given material, and therefore is higher than the values from method (i).

Summary of the Hydrogen Bond Interactions in NOTT-300 (Al).

A hydrogen bond system is conventionally represented as a linear A-H . . . B arrangement of a hydrogen donor (A-H) and an acceptor (B). Relevant properties of the different strengths of hydrogen bonds are given in Table Cl. In this system, the hydrogen bond length H . . . O is around 2.3 Å (FIG. 4 d), and therefore it can be classed as a moderate-to-weak hydrogen bond. The four C—H supramolecular contacts are likely to be of lower energies. Based on this analysis, we view the observed value of Q_(st) as entirely reasonable and consistent with the likely hydrogen bond energies. In addition, there is the possibility of electrostatic Al(III)/XO₂ interactions. The high CO₂ uptakes also reflect the relatively narrow pore size of the host which provides strong overlap potentials.

TABLE S13 Properties of strong, moderate and weak H-bonds. Properties Strong H-bonds Moderate H-bonds Weak H-bonds Bond energy 4-10 1-3 <1 (kJ mol⁻¹) Bond nature mostly mostly electrostatic covalent electrostatic Bond linearity, always mostly sometimes A-H . . . B linear linear linear Bond length 1.2 to 1.5 ca 1.0 ca 1.0 A-H (Å) Bond length 1.2 to 1.5 1.5 to 2.2 2.2 to 3.2 H . . . B (Å) Bond length 2.2 to 2.5 2.5 to 3.2 3.2 to 4.0 A . . . B (Å)

Example 2 Synthesis of NOTT-300 (In)

Biphenyl-3,3′,5,5′-tetracarboxylic acid (0.015 g, 0.045 mmol), In(NO₃).(H₂O)₅ (0.014 mg, 0.045 mmol) and piperazine (7.0 mg, 0.081 mmol) were mixed and dispersed in DMF/MeCN mixture (1.3 mL, 1:0.3 v/v). The white slurry was acidified with dilute nitric acid (5%, 0.3 mL) and heated to 100° C. Upon reaching 60° C. the white slurry was observed to fully dissolve resulting in a colourless solution followed by precipitation of a white crystalline powder which was washed sequentially with DMF and dried briefly in air. Powder diffraction data (PXRD) confirm that the parent MOF NOTT-300 (In)-solv is iso-structural to NOTT-300(Al)-solv. Yield: 20 mg (75%). Elemental analysis (% calc/found): [In₂(C₁₆H₆O₈)₂.(DMF)_(0.75).(H₂O)_(1.75) (C, 33.02/33.02; H, 2.20/2.53; N, 1.58/1.58). Selected IR(ATR): ν/cm⁻¹=1705 (s), 1669 (s), 1652 (s), 1612 (m), 1549 (s), 1423 (s), 1367 (s), 1311 (w), 1253 (w), 1226 (w), 974 (m), 799 (s), 709 (s).

Example 3 Synthesis of NOTT-300(Sb)

Biphenyl-3,3′,5,5′-tetracarboxylic acid (0.015 g, 0.045 mmol) and SbCl₃ (0.010 mg, 0.045 mmol) were mixed and dispersed in DMF/MeCN mixture (1.3 mL, 1:0.3 v/v). The white slurry was acidified with dilute nitric acid (5%, 0.3 mL) and heated to 100° C. Upon reaching 60° C. the white slurry was observed to fully dissolve resulting in a colourless solution followed by precipitation of a white crystalline powder which was washed sequentially with DMF and dried briefly in air. [Sb₂(C₁₆H₆O₈)-₂.(DMF)_(x).(H₂O)_(y). Colourless block (0.03×0.02×0.01 mm) I4₁22, a=15.4500(5) c=12.2908(6) Å, V=2933.9(2) Å³, Z=4, D_(calc)=1.362 g cm⁻³, μ=14.927 mm⁻¹, F(000)=1136. A total of 1473 reflections was collected, of which 1392 were unique, with R_(int)=0.0606. Final R₁ (wR₂)⁼0.0643 (0.2060) with GOF=1.880. The final difference Fourier extrema were 3.32 and −0.88 e/Å³.

Example 4 Synthesis of NOTT 300 (Cr)

Chromium nitrate, Cr(NO₃)₃.9H₂O, (0.36 g, 0.9 mmol) was dissolved in water (10 mL), biphenyl-3,3′,5,5′-tetracarboxylic acid (0.06 g, 0.18 mmol) was then added. Piperazine (0.1 g) was added followed by addition of 2.8 M nitric acid (2 mL). The reaction mixture was transferred to a 2 mL autoclave which was sealed and heated to 210° C. for 72-96 h. The resulting powder product was separated by filtration and washed with water.

Example 5 Synthesis of NOTT-300(Ga)

NOTT-300(Ga₂) {[Ga₂(OH)₂(C₁₆H₆O₈)]} was synthesised under solvothermal conditions by reacting biphenyl-3,3′,5,5′-tetracarboxylic acid (0.02 g, 0.06 mmol) and gallium nitrate, Ga(NO₃)₃.xH₂O, (0.1 g, 0.36 mmol), in a mixture of DMF, THF and water (8 mL, 2:5:1, v/v) which was then acidified with 5-15 drops of hydrochloric acid and heated at 75° C. for 72 h.

Crystal Structure of NOTT-300(Ga)

NOTT-301(Ga₂)-solv crystallises in a chiral space group 14122 and shows a 3D open framework structure constructed from 1D helical [Ga(OH)₂O₄]_(∞) chains bridged by tetracarboxylate ligand. The Ga(III) ion is octahedrally coordinated via six O-donors: four from carboxylate groups and two from bridging hydroxyl groups μ₂-OH which are aligned in cis confirmation.

TABLE 1 Summary of unit cell parameters for (Ga₂)-solvated, (Ga₂)-desolvated and (Ga₂)-CO2 loaded (In situ single crystal) Single Parameter cell Parameter cell Cell volume, Crystal (a = b), Å (c), Å Å³ M (Ga₂)-solv 15.1675(9) 11.9197(15) 2742.2(4) 688.68 (Ga₂) 15.0174(7) 11.9111(11) 2686.2(3) 499.66 CO₂-loaded 15.0535(6) 11.8737(10) 2690.7(3) 596.49

TABLE 2 Summary of unit cell parameters for (Ga_(2−x)Fe_(x))MOF (x = 0, 0.13, 0.21, 0.45) Parameter Parameter Cell cell (a = b), cell (c), volume, Å Å Å³ R_(Bragg) Rp Rwp GOF Ga₂ 15.0071(1) 11.8814(9) 2675.9(4) 0.045 0.068 0.01 4.512 Ga_(1.87)Fe_(0.13) 15.0439(7) 11.8767(6) 2687.9(3) 0.036 0.068 0.090 2.673 Ga_(1.79)Fe_(0.21) 14.9980(1) 11.8938(1) 2675.4(5) 0.02 0.059 0.076 1.293 Ga_(1.55)Fe_(0.45) 15.0684(8) 11.9111(8) 2704.5(4) 0.06 0.050 0.066 1.877

Example 6 Synthesis of NOTT-300(GaFe)

A mixed Ga—Fe material was obtained using a similar procedure but incorporating stoichiometric mixtures of gallium nitrate Ga(NO₃)₃.xH₂O and iron nitrate Fe(NO₃)₃. 9H₂O in the following ratios: [Ga_(1.87)Fe_(0.13)(OH)₂(C₁₆H₆O₈)]: (0.09 g, 0.34 mmol), (0.007 g, 0.18 mmol); [Ga_(1.79)Fe_(0.21)(OH)₂(C₁₆H₆O₈)]: (0.083 g, 0.32 mmol), (0.015 g, 0.036 mmol); [Ga_(1.55)Fe_(0.45)(OH)₂(C₁₆H₆O₈)]: (0.078 g, 0.31 mmol), (0.022 g, 0.054 mmol), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

In situ INS and PXRD studies on the non-amine-containing capture material NOTT-300 have led to the same conclusions, for all of the metal (III) complexes, namely that the M-OH groups (M=Al, Cr, Sb, In, Ga, Fe) in the pore cavity can participate in moderate interactions with XO₂ (X=C, S, N) and C₂H_(x) (x=2, 4, 6), and that these can be supplemented by cooperative interactions with adjacent C—H groups of benzene rings. The binding energy of these moderate-to-weak hydrogen bonds (Table 813) can be viewed as soft binding interactions, quite distinct from the direct bond formation between the N-centre of amine groups and the electro-positive C-carbon centre of CO₂. The latter, seen in amine systems, lead to very high isosteric heats of adsorption (40-90 kJ mol⁻¹ for physisorption; 85-105 kJ mol⁻¹ for chemisorption) and result in a substantial energy penalty to release adsorbed CO₂. The moderate isosteric heat of adsorption in NOTT-300 [eg 27-30 kJ mol⁻¹ for NOTT-300-(Al) (FIG. 3 b)] confirms that the relatively weak hydrogen bonding interactions within this OH— decorated system are sufficiently strong to selectively bind CO₂ and SO₂. The weak interaction is also evidenced by the fully reversible desorption isotherms observed for these gases. This offers great promise not only for the efficient capture of CO₂ SO₂, and NO₂ but also for their facile, low-energy and therefore economic release subsequently; moreover this “easy-on”/“easy-off” soft binding model is achieved without any reduction in either selectivity or capacity.

Gas Capture Apparatus

FIG. 27 illustrates a gas capture apparatus comprising a container 10 in which the MOF 40 is contained. The container 10 may have one or more inlets 20 in which gases may enter the container 10. The gases may be flue gases produced be a power station or from some other combustion or industrial processes for example in the production of iron, steel, ammonia and cement. In such applications the MOF 40 may be regenerated. In this case the MOF 40 in container 10 may be heated using a heater 80 so as drive-off adsorbed gases and regenerate the MOF 40 for its re-use. Alternatively desorption of gasses from the MOF 40 may proceed through the application of vacuum to the vessel containing the MOF. In such applications the container 10 may be in fluid connection with a vacuum pump 50 configured to draw off the gases (eg. XO₂ (X=C, S, N) or hydrocarbons such as C₂H₂, C₂H₄, C₂H₆), that have been trapped and subsequently released by the MOF, for subsequent storage, handling and/or transportation, for example the gases may be compressed or liquefied before subsequent handling or transportation. An inlet valve 60 may be closed and an outlet valve 70 may be opened whilst the MOF 40 is being heated so that the captured are not released back into the flue. Or a vacuum may be applied through valve 70 to desorb the gas from MOF 40 where heating is not used. Whilst the apparatus is being used to capture gases the inlet valve 60 will be open and the outlet valve 70 may be closed.

The MOF may also be used as part of a cartridge system in which a cartridge 90 (or other container/mechanism to support or hold the MOF) is placed in the gas stream to be processed. The cartridge 90 may then be removed from the gas stream so as to be regenerated off-line from the gas stream. FIG. 28( a) illustrates such a cartridge 90 placed within a gas stream. The cartridge 90 may cover the majority of the cross section of a conduit 100 carrying the gas stream or may be adapted to cover substantially all of the conduit cross section as illustrated in FIG. 28( a). When the cartridge 90 is in the conduit 100, the conduit 100 may form both the inlet 20 and the outlet 30 (as illustrated in FIG. 28( a)). Such a cartridge system may be useful for anaesthetic systems and exhausts systems from combustion. FIG. 28( b) illustrates a cartridge at the end of a flue or exhaust pipe. In this case the side or sides of the cartridge distal from the flue may act as the outlet 30.

Experimental Information—Physical characterisation

All reagents were used as received from commercial suppliers without further purification. Analyses for C, H and N were carried out on a CE-440 elemental analyzer (EAI Company). Thermal gravimetric analyses (TGA) were performed under N₂ flow (100 ml/min) with a heating rate of 2° C./min using a TA SDT-600 thermogravimetric analyzer (TA Company). IR spectra were recorded using a Nicolet Avatar 360 FT-IR spectrophotometer. High-resolution transmission electron microscopy (TEM) imaging was performed using a Jeol 2100F transmission electron microscope using an accelerating voltage of 100 kV. TEM samples were prepared by casting several drops of a suspension of the NOTT-300 solvate complex in water onto copper-grid mounted lacy carbon film before drying under a stream of nitrogen. Variable temperature powder X-ray diffraction data (PXRD) were collected over the 2θ range 4-50° on a Bruker Advance D8 diffractometer using Cu—Kα₁ radiation (λ=1.54056 Å, 40 kV/40 mA), and the temperature was controlled by an Oxford Cryosystems open-flow cryostat operating at 100-483 K.

CO₂, SO₂, CH₄, CO, N₂, Oz, H₂ and Ar sorption isotherms were recorded at 77 K (liquid nitrogen), 87 K (liquid argon) or 273-303 K (temperature-programmed water bath from Hiden Company) on an IGA-003 system at the University of Nottingham under ultra-high vacuum from a diaphragm and turbo pumping system. All gases used were ultra-pure research grade (99.999%) purchased from BOC or AIRLIQUIDE. The density of the desolvated NOTT-300 sample used in buoyancy corrections was 1.80 g cm⁻³ and was estimated from the crystallographic density of the desolvated sample derived from the PLATON/SOLV¹ results. In a typical gas adsorption experiment, ˜100 mg of NOTT-300 (Al)-solvate was loaded into the IGA, and degassed at 120° C. and high vacuum (10⁻¹⁰ bar) for 1 day to give fully desolvated NOTT-300 (Al).

INS spectra were recorded on the TOSCA spectrometer at the ISIS Facility at the Rutherford Appleton Laboratory (UK) for energy transfers between ˜−2 and 500 meV. In this region TOSCA has a resolution of ˜1% ΔE/E. The desolvated NOTT-300 (Al) sample was loaded into a cylindrical vanadium sample container with an annealed copper vacuum seal and connected to a gas handling system. The sample was degassed at 10⁻⁷ mbar and 140° C. for 1 day to remove any remaining trace guest water molecules. The temperature during data collection was controlled using a helium cryostat (7±0.2 K). The loading of CO₂ was performed at room temperature in order to ensure that CO₂ was present in the gas phase when not adsorbed and also to ensure sufficient mobility of CO₂ inside the crystalline structure of NOTT-300 (Al). The loading of H₂ was performed at 40-50 K in order ensure that H₂ was adsorbed into NOTT-300 (Al). Subsequently, the temperature was reduced to below 10 K in order to perform the scattering measurements with the minimum achievable thermal motion for CO2 or H₂. Background spectra (sample can plus NOTT-300 (Al)) were subtracted to obtain the difference spectra. INS was used to study the binding interaction and structure dynamics in this case, because it has several unique advantages:

-   -   INS spectroscopy is ultra-sensitive to the vibrations of         hydrogen atoms, and hydrogen is ten times more visible than         other elements due to its high neutron cross-section.     -   The technique is not subject to any optical selection rules. All         vibrations are active and, in principle, measurable.     -   INS observations are not restricted to the centre of the         Brillouin zone (gamma point) as is the case for optical         techniques.     -   INS spectra can be readily and accurately modelled: the         intensities are proportional to the concentration of elements in         the sample and their cross-sections, and the measured INS         intensities relate straightforwardly to the associated         displacements of the scattering atom. Treatment of background         correction is also straightforward.     -   Neutrons penetrate deeply into materials and pass readily         through the walls of metal containers making neutrons ideal to         measure bulk properties of this material.     -   INS spectrometers cover the whole range of the molecular         vibrational spectrum, 0-500 meV (0-4000 cm⁻¹)     -   INS data can be collected at below 10 K, where the thermal         motion of the MOF material and adsorbed CO₂ molecules can be         significantly reduced. 

1. A metal organic framework comprising a metal ion (M) and an organic ligand wherein more than one hydroxy ligand are present about the metal ion.
 2. The metal organic framework of claim 1 wherein the metal organic framework forms a three-dimensional framework incorporating corner sharing MO₄(OH)₂ octahedra.
 3. The metal organic framework of claims 1-2, wherein the metal ions (M) are octahedrally coordinated as MO₄(OH)₂ units wherein four of the oxygen atoms are from the organic ligands and the coordination sphere is completed by hydroxy ligands.
 4. The metal organic framework of claims 1-3 wherein hydroxy ligands point into the channels of the framework.
 5. The metal organic framework of any previous claim, wherein the metal ion is a metal (III) ion.
 6. The metal organic framework of claims 1-5, wherein the metal of the metal ion is one of Al(III), Cr(III), Sb(III), In(III), Ga(III), and Fe(III).
 7. The metal organic framework of claims 1-6 wherein the metal organic framework is synthesised using a metal (III) ion.
 8. The metal organic framework of claim 7 wherein the metal organic framework is synthesised using one of Al(III), In(III), Sb(III), Ga(III), Cr(III), Fe(III) and Co(III) as the metal (III) ion.
 9. The metal organic framework of any previous claims comprising of more than a single type of metal(III) ions.
 10. The metal organic framework of claims 1-9, wherein the metal organic framework comprises a polycarboxylate ligand.
 11. The metal organic framework of claims 1-10, wherein the polycarboxylate ligand is a tetracarboxylate ligand.
 12. The metal organic framework of claims 1-11 wherein the tetracarboxylate ligand is a phenyl tetracraboxlyate ligand.
 13. The metal organic framework of the claims 1-12 wherein the phenyltetracarboxylate ligand has the formula:

wherein R is one of


14. The metal organic framework of the claim 12 wherein, two of A, B, C, D, or E are —COOH and two of F, G, H, I or J are —COOH.
 15. The metal organic framework of the claim 12 wherein, when only one of A, B, C, D, or E are —COOH and only one of F, G, H, I or J are —COOH, then two of T, S, U and V are —COOH or

and S—V=H, F, Cl, Br, I, CH3, CH2CH3, CH(CH3)2, C(CH3)3, NH2, NHR′, NR′R″, OH, OR′, CO2H, CO2R′, CF3, NHCOR′, NHCONHR′, NHSO2R′, SO3H and where R′ and R″ are selected from the group consisting C₁ to C₅ alkyl.
 16. The metal organic framework of any preceding claim wherein the organic ligand is selected from the group consisting of:


17. A method for producing a metal-organic framework comprising the steps of: a. providing a metal salt; b. providing an organic ligand; c. mixing the metal salt and the organic ligand; and d. reacting the metal salt with organic ligand to form a metal-organic framework, wherein the metal salt is a metal (III) salt and wherein the organic ligand is a polycarboxylic acid.
 18. The method of claim 17 wherein the polycarboxylic acid is a tetracarboxylic acid.
 19. The method of claim 18 wherein the tetracarboxylic acid is a phenyltetracarboxylic acid.
 20. The method of claims 17-19 wherein the phenyltetracarboxylate ligand precursor has the general formula:

wherein R is one of:

wherein N=0, 1, 2, 3, or 4, four of the A-J groups are carboxylate groups, and S—V=H, F, Cl, Br, I, CH3, CH2CH3, CH(CH3)2, C(CH3)3, NH2, NHR′, NR′R″, OH, OR′, CO2H, CO2R′, CF3, NHCOR′, NHCONHR′, NHSO2R′, SO3H and where R′ and R″ are selected from the group consisting C₁ to C₅ alkyl.
 21. The method of any one of claims 17 to 20 wherein the metal of the metal salt is a metal (III) salt preferably Al(III), Cr(III), Sb(III), In(III), Ga(III), and Fe(III).
 22. The method of any one of claims 17 to 21 wherein the metal (III) salt is a metal (III) nitrate.
 23. The method of any one of claims 17 to 21 wherein the metal (III) salt is a metal (III) chloride.
 24. The method of claim 22 wherein the metal of the metal nitrate is one of Al(III), Cr(III), Sb(III), In(III), Ga(III), or Fe(II) nitrate.
 25. The method of claim 23 wherein the metal of the metal chloride is one of Al(III), Cr(III), Sb(III), In(III), Ga(III), or Fe(III) chloride.
 26. The method of claim 17 to 25 wherein: the metal organic framework is M₂(OH)₂(C₁₆O₈H₆) and the method comprises reacting biphenyl-3,3′,5,5′-tetracarboxylic acid with Ml(III) salts, preferably Al(III), In(III), Ga(III), Cr(III), Fe(III) and Co(III) nitrates or Sb(III)Cl₃.
 27. The method of claims 17 to 26 wherein the metal salt is comprised a stoichiometric mixture of more than one type of metal salt, preferably Al(III), Cr(III), Sb(III), In(III), Ga(III), and Fe(III) salts.
 28. The method of claims 17 to 27 wherein the stoichiometric mixture of more than one type of metal salt is a mixture of metal nitrate salts, preferably Al(III), Cr(III), Sb(III), In(III), Ga(III), and Fe(III) nitrates.
 29. The method of claims 17 to 28 wherein the stoichiometric mixture of more than one type of metal salt is a mixture of metal nitrate salts, preferably Al(III), Cr(III), Sb(III), In(II), Ga(III), and Fe(III) chlorides.
 30. The method of any one of claims 17 to 29 wherein the metal organic framework is (Ga_(2-x)Fe_(x))(OH)₂(C₁₆O₈H₈), x>0, and the method comprises reacting a stoichiometric mixture of gallium nitrate, iron nitrate, hydrochloric acid and biphenyl-3,3′,5,5′-tetracarboxylic acid under solvothermal conditions.
 31. The method of claim 17 to 30 wherein a mixture of one or more of dimethylformamide, tetrahydrofuran and water are used to provide the reaction solvent.
 32. Use of a metal organic framework incorporating metal hydroxy units to capture one or more of XO₂ (X=C, S, N), or a C₂H_(n) (n=2, 4, 6) by the formation of a weak electrostatic interactions between the XO₂ or C₂H molecule and the MOF.
 33. Use of a metal organic framework comprising a metal hydroxy moiety to capture one or more of XO₂ (X=C, S, N), or a C₂H_(n) (n=2, 4, 6) by the formation of a weak electrostatic interactions between the XO₂ or C₂H_(n) molecule and the organic ligand set of the MOF.
 34. Use of metal organic framework according to claims 1-16 wherein the metal organic framework is any metal organic framework made by the method of any one of claims 17 to 31 for one or more of: (i) scrubbing exhaust gas streams of acidic gases; (ii) scrubbing natural gas of acidic gases by separation or sequestration; (iii) separating C₂H_(n) or other VOC gases from other gases.
 35. A gas storage system comprising: an inlet for receiving gas containing XO₂ (X=C, S, N), and/or C₂H_(n) (n=2, 4, 6); and a container for receiving the gas from the inlet; and a storage material comprising the metal organic framework of any one claims 1 to 16 or a metal organic framework made by the method of any one of claims 17 to
 31. 36. The incorporation of the. storage material comprising the metal organic framework of any one claims 1 to 16 or a metal organic framework made by the method of any one of claims 17 to 31 in a membrane, or another substrate, for purpose of supporting the MOF material towards molecular separation or sieving. 